DebateAnything.com  

Go Back   DebateAnything.com > The Debate Lounge > Serious Debate

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:15 PM
L-car114's Avatar
The Anti Samson
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Down on the corner
Posts: 3,309
My Mood:
L-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond reputeL-car114 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
He'll do what he's already doing....follow the path laid in stone by the DNC....he has'nt varied from it yet. Gut the military, levy confis***ory taxes on the populace, saddle the country with expensive, never-ending social problems we neither need, nor want, foster an environment hostile to business, and after his house o' cards crumbles, blame the "previous administration".

But, if we elect McCain....well! We get all that, and a non-promise to name conservatives to the federal courts.



We have to pay for all that candy the fed is going to lavish us with.....or, if we dont' actually get the candy, we'll have to pay for it anyway. At least, assuming you can afford the gas, you'll be able to enjoy all the new highway rest stops named after sitting senators.
Just what we need more rest stops for the gangs to tag the walls of the restrooms so that the cities and counties can clean and paint them on a weekly basis and then close them to let the paint dry which is just about the time I'll pull in to the stop to use them.

Hopefully they'll use water based paint so the oil co's won't profit from that too.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:23 PM
fat mike's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 23,621
My Mood:
fat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Experts have said, however, the planned expansions will not be enough to keep pace with demand growth, leaving the United States
from sams article
__________________
ill have you know irl most look on me as a beacon of normalcy
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:28 PM
SAMSON's Avatar
Abominable Troll
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Where the Deer & Antelpoe Play
Posts: 26,621
Blog Entries: 2
SAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable Salami
Send a message via AIM to SAMSON
Default

Experts?

You mean guys that are not the CEO of ExxonMobil?


__________________
Banned Before Bored
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:41 PM
fat mike's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 23,621
My Mood:
fat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

apparently
__________________
ill have you know irl most look on me as a beacon of normalcy
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:46 PM
DngrMse's Avatar
Seņor Member/50 bux richer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In Canadia!
Posts: 5,160
My Mood:
DngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond reputeDngrMse has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to DngrMse
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMSON View Post
dems....dems...dems.....blah, BLAH, Blah BLAH.
Yes, Samson...dems. Just yesterday they blocked a proposal to allow drilling 50 miles from our coasts...it's what they do. Clinton vetoed legislation allowing the exploration of 2000 acres in ANWR. It was Clinton that put the entire west coast continental shelf 'off limits'. It's democrats in congress that each and every year attach a rider to the budget making it illegal to negotiate shale oil leases on federal lands. If I'm wrong about the democrats, feel free to school me. Go ahead and show me where I'm wrong.

Quote:
Existing refineries ARE EXPANDING:

Marathon
Let's be honest here. ONE company announced plans for a major expansion of an existing refinery.....in 2005. Have they broken ground yet? This announcement was from over a year ago. How many lawsuits have been filed to stop this to date? Do you have any updates on this that are maybe....recent? Like from this year?

I'd like to add that improvements in our technological expertise makes expansions of existing facilities a wise business decision. We have less than half the refineries than we did in 1980.....while capacity in the surviving refineries have increased eight fold. But it's been 30+ years since a new refinery has been built in this country, and changes in technology make building vs expanding attractive....and there are appli***ions to build new refineries, one such filed recently in Montana, ( and like your Marathon example, is probably tied up in court, where it will remain for years).

Quote:

This has NOTHING to do with EVUL "dems" that Rushlimbaughwannabes want to blame, and everything to do with the economics of crude production and processing.
First, are you seriously contending that dems do not, and are not blocking domestic expansion in domestic petroleum production? How have I mischaracterized democrats? Care to provide some examples of dems that have bucked the party line, and forced passage of bills allowing the expansion of domestic oil production?

Second, I don't know why you feel it's important to drag your favorite bogey man, (Limbaugh), into every political conversation...but what the hell does he have to do with anything?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:02 PM
SAMSON's Avatar
Abominable Troll
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Where the Deer & Antelpoe Play
Posts: 26,621
Blog Entries: 2
SAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable Salami
Send a message via AIM to SAMSON
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
We have less than half the refineries than we did in 1980.....while capacity in the surviving refineries have increased eight fold.
Hmmm......Dems have not control both the Congress AND the Presidency since 1980....Republicans, however.........but I digress... This does however support the proposition that Total Refinery Capacity has, and IS increasing (just today I visited a brand new, 6,000 bbl/d refinery), INDEPENDENTLY of the Dem party policy you seem so eager to dogmatically argue is the cause of high gasoline prices.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
First, are you seriously contending that dems do not, and are not blocking domestic expansion in domestic petroleum production? How have I mischaracterized democrats? Care to provide some examples of dems that have bucked the party line, and forced passage of bills allowing the expansion of domestic oil production?
Yes. Are you seriously proposing that Our Congress would block domestic expansion of domestic petroleum if their constituants had to wait in line for gas?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
Second, I don't know why you feel it's important to drag your favorite bogey man, (Limbaugh), into every political conversation...but what the hell does he have to do with anything?
Because, you sound like him: constantly trying to remain revelant by demonizing "liberal=democrat policy."
__________________
Banned Before Bored
Reply With Quote
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:11 PM
SAMSON's Avatar
Abominable Troll
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Where the Deer & Antelpoe Play
Posts: 26,621
Blog Entries: 2
SAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable Salami
Send a message via AIM to SAMSON
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
If I'm wrong about the democrats, feel free to school me. Go ahead and show me where I'm wrong.
Quote:
The US oil industry intends to scale back its plans for refinery expansions - which could keep gasoline prices high for years to come.

A push from Congress and the White House for huge increases in biofuels such as ethanol has reportedly prompted the decision. A push from Congress and the White House for huge increases in biofuels such as ethanol has reportedly prompted the decision.
Um....The White House = Republican

Quote:
Shell Joins $7bn US Refinery Expansion"

On September 21, 2007, Financial Times cited Booz Allen's Viren Doshi in an article about Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco's $7 billion investment to expand their Port Arthur, Texas refinery.


Doshi said the investment had worrying impli***ions for European refiners, especially if US demand weakens as a result of the rise of bio-fuels and more fuel-efficient cars.
“A number of European refining companies rely on exports to the US. Sooner or later demand is going to plateau, and the biggest doom and gloom scenarios will be in Europe,” said Doshi
Its ECONOMICS buddy.

As the availability of alternative fuels rises, the financial risks of building/expanding refineries rises.
__________________
Banned Before Bored

Last edited by SAMSON; 06-12-2008 at 09:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:54 PM
fat mike's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 23,621
My Mood:
fat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

i guess i can see that but big oil is invested more than anyone on these alternative sources-why tf dont they push it?
__________________
ill have you know irl most look on me as a beacon of normalcy
Reply With Quote
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:15 PM
SAMSON's Avatar
Abominable Troll
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Where the Deer & Antelpoe Play
Posts: 26,621
Blog Entries: 2
SAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable SalamiSAMSON Abominable Salami
Send a message via AIM to SAMSON
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fat mike View Post
i guess i can see that but big oil is invested more than anyone on these alternative sources-why tf dont they push it?
Um...by not increasing oil refinery capacity, they ARE "pushing it."
__________________
Banned Before Bored
Reply With Quote
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:54 PM
fat mike's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 23,621
My Mood:
fat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond reputefat mike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

its a plot?
__________________
ill have you know irl most look on me as a beacon of normalcy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Insurance Companies... Tally Woman's Lounge 1 12-26-2007 10:20 AM
Are Privately Owned Gravedigging Companies Legal in Russia? User10539783 History ,non rhetorical Philosophy and Religion 3 11-06-2007 01:58 AM
House OKs new taxes on oil companies User10539783 Political & Government 10 08-07-2007 09:10 PM
Music licensing companies come calling for royalties fat mike Current Events 0 07-13-2007 05:46 AM
Health Insurance Companies Suck User10539783 Thumbtacks lair... 0 05-03-2007 03:09 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0