Conservatism's Death Rattle - Page 3

Fayebelle · #21 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 05:54 PM

Don't forget- Unwed mother

**SAMSON** · #22 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fayebelle

Don't forget- Unwed mother

^^^^^

See......I bet she also doesn't wear a bra.......

Fayebelle · #23 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 05:59 PM

Sometimes.

However - all of these things are balanced by the fact that I voted for Bush. Twice.

**SAMSON** · #24 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fayebelle

Sometimes.

However - all of these things are balanced by the fact that I voted for Bush. Twice.

Bah....

You were probably suffering from some Hooka Bar Hallucinogen whilst voting.

**Freedom&Liberty** · #25 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sebastian

Um, your point?

California became a state 50 years before income was ever taxed.

Quote:

This is the main point where conservative/Republican ideology fails most miserably. It does benefit US to take care of the elderly, orphans and the disabled. By allowing someone to suffer whom you might otherwise be able to help hurts us by a loss of our humanity. Compassion and cooperative work set us apart from the animals...just not Republicans.

This shouldn't be a political issue. Only a dumb ass democrat would make it one.

Quote:

Read it dozens of times. I get different interpretations than other people, so obviously do you. "Right" and "wrong" are relative...

No. The government has no business acting as an insurance company or a charity. Again, only a dumb ass democrat would ever interpret the constitution in such a way. Note how I didn't use the word "liberal". That's because a true liberal would never be in favor of wealth redistribution, but an asshole democrat would.

Quote:

I disagree. People of compassion and empathy are the best hope for saving this potentially great nation.

In order ot be fair to all citizens, government should have no compassion or empathy, Only a pillow chewing, bed wetting democrat would want such things. Grow the fuck up and help your neighbor on your own with your own money and I'll do the same. Only a complete dumbass would want the government in the middle.

Fayebelle · #26 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAMSON

Bah....

You were probably suffering from some Hooka Bar Hallucinogen whilst voting.

That or I just really wanted my Bay Bay Dadday to stay in the Middle East

**SAMSON** · #27 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fayebelle

That or I just really wanted my Bay Bay Dadday to stay in the Middle East

I KNEW IT!!!

You wanted freedom to plot and scheme for YOUR LIBERAL ADGENDA of supporting gay black mens' marriages to people with tatoos!!!!!

**Sebastian** · #28 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom&Liberty

California became a state 50 years before income was ever taxed.

Again, what's the point? What does the income tax and California's statehood have to do with "do it yourself" rhetoric?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom&Liberty

This shouldn't be a political issue. Only a dumb ass democrat would make it one...Again, only a dumb ass democrat...a true liberal would never be in favor of wealth redistribution, but an asshole democrat would...

You must be in the top 20% tax bracket to be so hopped up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom&Liberty

In order ot be fair to all citizens, government should have no compassion or empathy

That's just absurd, and frightening. So war widows should just take their hubby's last paycheck (docked for the days that month he missed to "being dead") and get a freaking job. I mean, what a bunch of bedwetting sissygirls, crying about their dead husbands and hungry kids and unpaid bills. Freeloaders!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom&Liberty

Only a pillow chewing, bed wetting democrat would want such things. Grow the fuck up and help your neighbor on your own with your own money and I'll do the same. Only a complete dumbass would want the government in the middle.

What if your neighbor doesn't need help and TWO of mine do? It's still all on me? What if your community has a higher rate of orphans than mine? Are YOU going to go investigate your neighbor's allegations of child abuse? And you'll take the kids when you find them beaten and neglected? Are you REALLY?

I find it disturbing that the people least likely to help their neighbor (conservatives) are the same ones who say we should help them, NOT government. Like all the anti-choice activists who have don't adopt foster children...hypocrites.

Fayebelle · #29 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sebastian

I find it disturbing that the people least likely to help their neighbor (conservatives) are the same ones who say we should help them, NOT government.

Prove this statement. If Democrats had faith in their fellow man they would not feel the need for the Government to step in. Democrats now have the majority- voted there by liberals- do you think this means government programs will be reduced since obviously the majority of the country is now full of kind hearted liberals?

**SAMSON** · #30 (**permalink**) 11-09-2008, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fayebelle

Prove this statement. If Democrats had faith in their fellow man they would not feel the need for the Government to step in. Democrats now have the majority- voted there by liberals- do you think this means government programs will be reduced since obviously the majority of the country is now full of kind hearted liberals?

"Liberals" weren't the only ones that voted for Democratic Candidates.

When will it dawn on "Conservatives" that ALL Democrats might not be "Liberal?"

This silly labling game is a good example of why the Republican Party is Up Shit Creek Without A Paddle.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What happens in death?	Edea 200	History ,non rhetorical Philosophy and Religion	9	01-05-2007 09:14 PM