Global Warming On Mars!!!!!!!!! - Page 8

User10539783 · #71 (**permalink**) 03-06-2007, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerboss

It would be safe to say that liberals are pro abortion while conservatives are pro life. Do I always have to preface it by stating that there are exceptions or do we accept the generalization? It would be safe to say that liberals are for more government social programss and conservatives are for less social programs. Those are both generalizations and they are accurate. OF COURSE there are exceptions, nobody has claimed otherwise.

I agree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerboss

Certainly there are stupid people out there. Anyone who still romanticizes about communism is a stupid idiot.

The true meaning of communism is not possible right now due to the fact that we as humans are not ready to accept the idea of a perfect society and therefore flaws are made to compensate. The true uptopia, is the essence of what future society will be in say 300 to 500 years. The leaders of communist governments, right now, take far more than they should. This leads to corruption and hurts the people instead of helping them as the perfect communism idea would have. In essence, it is better than a democracy, but only once we have evolved enough not to need wars and other negative attributes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerboss

Yeah, LOL, as soon as I see you reprimand the leader in the personal attack ***egory, the masturbating monkey himself, now referred to as

, also known as Sebastian. When I see you tell them the same thing, I'll repect your statement. Otherwise, forget it.

Forgive me if you took my statement as reprimanding you. I normally, just make statements. They aren't made to reprimand anyone. I'm not your mother nor his mother either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerboss

LOL. I cannot believe that I am explaining to grown adults that there are exceptions to every generalization. Frankly, it's astounding.

There are exceptions to just about everything. From reading your posts it didn't appear that you knew there were. I'm glad we are both clear on that now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerboss

FWIW, I've got no gripe against you. I've yet to discuss or debate any serious topic with you. If you keep it clean with me, I'll return the favor.

Nor I with you. I normally don't debate or discuss serious topics here. Once in a while you'll ***ch me though

Most of the time I'm in for lounge banter

**flaming_liberal** · #72 (**permalink**) 03-06-2007, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerboss

Thanks, but my name isn't God.

Don't flatter yourself Flamo. You've yet to address the issue. Why do you keep dodging and flailing and resort to the attacks?
Everyone is waiting for you to point out all these fallacies that you claimed existed but still after how many days, nothing?
What are you afraid of?

My memory is great, thanks. I remember that you are a liar. Why was I banned? What's the latest excuse?

Actually, I'm very confident and comfortable in the positions that I take and the proof that I offer in my positions. Your inability to back up your original statement about all the fallacies demonstrates that you don't have a meaningful or cogent counter argument which explains your frustration, rage, and anger.

Come on Flamo, cite the fallacies. We're still waiting, you clown.

Waits for thumbtack to inform Flamo to Debate the post, not the poster.

With whom? You? You're an idiot who has not even the slightest sense of humor. Besides, I have a life. This board is about the least important thing I ever do with my time. Grinding my teeth is more important, so please, do not get in all of a tizzy and quit masturbating to these fantasies that you are in some amazing debate, because you don't even know what you're talking about. It's simply pathetic. You don't even recognize the fact that everyone in the world acknowledges that global climate change has always occurred. If you can't even grasp a simple concept like that, then how am I to explain to you the concept of influence?

User10539783 · #73 (**permalink**) 03-06-2007, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boedicca

It must be VOLDAR'S FAULT!

Mars is experiencing Global Warming at the same time the Earth is. Either the Martians are on the same Path of Destruction by exploiting some liquid remains of Martian Dinos. It couldn't be that the SUN is warming both planets.

That would make too much sense.

Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a natural—and not a human- induced—cause, according to one scientist's controversial theory.

Earth is currently experiencing rapid warming, which the vast majority of climate scientists says is due to humans pumping huge amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

Mars, too, appears to be enjoying more mild and balmy temperatures.

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row.

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of the St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun.

"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said....

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-warming.html

This is made up by a select group of scientists that make up other causes of global warming. They are paid by big industry lobbies. National Geographic has tons of advertisers (money). The whole thing boils down to money. It has been proven that global warming is caused by human interference (pollution) by using a super-computer. The super computer predicts the future of weather. Big industries that profit over polluting products (ie., car makers, gas/oil companies, air fresheners, and other stuff that affects the atmosphere is a negative way) would lose money if everyone switched to products that are environmentally safe.

**hadit** · #74 (**permalink**) 03-06-2007, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thumbtack

This is made up by a select group of scientists that make up other causes of global warming. They are paid by big industry lobbies. National Geographic has tons of advertisers (money). The whole thing boils down to money. It has been proven that global warming is caused by human interference (pollution) by using a super-computer. The super computer predicts the future of weather. Big industries that profit over polluting products (ie., car makers, gas/oil companies, air fresheners, and other stuff that affects the atmosphere is a negative way) would lose money if everyone switched to products that are environmentally safe.

Who proved it, using what computer, and who paid them to do it? National Geographic is one of the greenest enterprises out there, so claiming they were bought off by their advertisers is bogus.

**SAMSON** · #75 (**permalink**) 03-06-2007, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thumbtack

The super computer predicts the future of weather. Big industries that profit over polluting products (ie., car makers, gas/oil companies, air fresheners, and other stuff that affects the atmosphere is a negative way) would lose money if everyone switched to products that are environmentally safe.

Ok, so....um....could you ask the "super computer" what the weather in Colorado will be like in early June? I have a va***ion planned, and I need to know.

And nobody I know wants me to get rid of air freshener.

**Powerboss** · #76 (**permalink**) 03-07-2007, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flaming_liberal

With whom? You? You're an idiot who has not even the slightest sense of humor. Besides, I have a life. This board is about the least important thing I ever do with my time. Grinding my teeth is more important, so please, do not get in all of a tizzy and quit masturbating to these fantasies that you are in some amazing debate, because you don't even know what you're talking about. It's simply pathetic. You don't even recognize the fact that everyone in the world acknowledges that global climate change has always occurred. If you can't even grasp a simple concept like that, then how am I to explain to you the concept of influence?

Hey, I read you like to dress up as a girl.

Is that true?

Have you had your head examined?

Java · #77 (**permalink**) 03-07-2007, 05:11 AM

The only problem is ... Globally ... Mars is not warming ... the other ice cap is enlarging and there is scarce data from the rest of the planet

Even IF it were, it does not prove that the current Earth warming is not mostly anthropogenic

from the national geo article

Quote:

Perhaps the biggest stumbling block in Abdussamatov's theory is his dismissal of the greenhouse effect, in which atmospheric gases such as carbon dioxide help keep heat trapped near the planet's surface.

He claims that carbon dioxide has only a small influence on Earth's climate and virtually no influence on Mars

.

His crackpot theory is at-odds with ALL the scientific evidence about the effect of C02 on the earth, a mere 100 ppm makes the difference between warm periods and full-blown ice ages

**flaming_liberal** · #78 (**permalink**) 03-07-2007, 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerboss

Hey, I read you like to dress up as a girl.

Is that true?

Have you had your head examined?

What a sweet burn. Now only if it were slightly more original...

Tell me, did you have to look that up or did someone volunteer to help you out there?

**Powerboss** · #79 (**permalink**) 03-07-2007, 06:39 AM

Is it true?

**boedicca** · #80 (**permalink**) 03-07-2007, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thumbtack

It has been proven that global warming is caused by human interference (pollution) by using a super-computer. The super computer predicts the future of weather. Big industries that profit over polluting products ....

Who built the Super-Computer - and who benefits from promoting Global Warming as a Imminent Threat?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
There is no global warming	EJ Stone	Non Philosphical Rhetoric	33	10-30-2008 11:38 PM
Global Warming	DngrMse	Science & Technology	39	02-19-2008 05:36 AM
Global warming is for retards:	viking	Science & Technology	9	06-12-2007 03:07 PM